American Glob

The left has been in full screech mode for over a week now, trying to prove that a Tea Party attendee spit on Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D, MO) as he walked to the House of Representatives. The video shows a man cupping his hands into a makeshift megaphone as the congressman passes by and the left is just convinced that this is irrefutable evidence that the man spit on the congressman.

Did he actually spit? I doubt it. But let’s talk about spitting and while we’re at it, let’s discuss some other bodily fluids.

I realize I’m a little late to this story but it occurred to me that very few people on both sides of the debate have mentioned a similar yet far more shocking incident. At the Republican National Convention in 2008, a group of leftists calling themselves The RNC Welcoming Committee, was waiting to ambush RNC attendees.

In fact, were it not for diligent law enforcement authorities in Minnesota, these leftist scumbags were prepared to hurl buckets of human urine and feces at RNC attendees, delegates, and congressmen. The photo below was taken after a raid at the RNC Welcoming Committee’s HQ. Among assorted weapons, the buckets of human waste can be seen in the lower left. Click the image to enlarge.

So to all you hyperventilating Dems, Progressives and media types (same difference) I ask, which is worse? A spitting incident which you can’t definitively prove but also can’t stop talking about? Or a very real and verifiable incident that would have had far more disgusting results without the intervention of law enforcement and about which you never reported?

Want to know what I believe, Democrats/Media? I believe there was no outrage from you over this because you would have liked it! Oh, sure if you were pressed to comment in public you’d say the right things, but deep down you would have been snickering to yourselves to see Republicans doused in human filth.

So why don’t you file your spittle outrage stories in the same place you put your non-coverage of the RNC Welcoming Committee.

Wake me up when conservatives get caught red handed by cops with a plan to throw buckets of human waste at you.

Then we’ll talk.

As Pelosi and Obama contemplate using reconciliation or the “nuclear option” to pass ObamaCare, it’s important that we all stroll down memory lane to see how the Dems felt about that kind of thing under Bush.

Beautiful and just…

What happens when the Democrats don’t like the poll results reported by the most accurate pollster in the United States?

They attack the pollster, of course….

“Democrats are turning their fire on Scott Rasmussen, the prolific independent pollster whose surveys on elections, President Obama’s popularity and a host of other issues are surfacing in the media with increasing frequency.”

“The pointed attacks reflect a hardening conventional wisdom among prominent liberal bloggers and many Democrats that Rasmussen Reports polls are, at best, the result of a flawed polling model and, at worst, designed to undermine Democratic politicians and the party’s national agenda.”

Obama’s tanking poll numbers can’t possibly have anything to do with his agenda or his stupid policy decisions.

It must be racism.

Is Harry Reid getting desperate or is he just really stupid?

“Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took his GOP-blasting rhetoric to a new level Monday, comparing Republicans who oppose health care reform to lawmakers who clung to the institution of slavery more than a century ago.”

“Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took his GOP-blasting rhetoric to a new level Monday, comparing Republicans who oppose health care reform to lawmakers who clung to the institution of slavery more than a century ago.”

“The Nevada Democrat, in a sweeping set of accusations on the Senate floor, also compared health care foes to those who opposed women’s suffrage and the civil rights movement — even though it was Sen. Strom Thurmond, then a Democrat, who unsuccessfully tried to filibuster the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and it was Republicans who led the charge against slavery.”

“Senate Republicans on Monday called Reid’s comments “offensive” and “unbelievable.”

“But Reid argued that Republicans are using the same stalling tactics employed in the pre-Civil War era.”

“Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all the Republicans can come up with is, ‘slow down, stop everything, let’s start over.’ If you think you’ve heard these same excuses before, you’re right,” Reid said Monday. “When this country belatedly recognized the wrongs of slavery, there were those who dug in their heels and said ‘slow down, it’s too early, things aren’t bad enough.’”

“He continued: “When women spoke up for the right to speak up, they wanted to vote, some insisted they simply, slow down, there will be a better day to do that, today isn’t quite right.”

“When this body was on the verge of guaranteeing equal civil rights to everyone regardless of the color of their skin, some senators resorted to the same filibuster threats that we hear today.”

As if the argument wasn’t dumb enough on its face, it’s historically inaccurate. Check out the video below with Historian David Barton. Did you know the first 7 Black Americans voted into Congress were Republicans? This is fascinating stuff…

The American left is very effective when it comes to keeping prayer out of public schools. One has to wonder if they will use their skills to stop this…

“LEWISTON — A national Muslim civil rights organization has filed a formal request with the Lewiston School Department to allow a middle school student to pray on school property. The group also wants Lewiston to modify existing policy and provide “constitutionally protected religious accommodation,” such as a designated prayer room.”

“The group has also requested the school department institute diversity training for school staff, and to ensure the middle-schooler won’t face retaliation because of her request to pray at the Lewiston Middle School.”

“According to the Washington, D.C.,-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, seventh-grader Nasra Aden had been routinely “praying discreetly during her free time or lunch break in a corner of a school hallway.” But, on Tuesday, CAIR asserts a teacher told Aden “never to pray on school property” after Aden was seen preparing to kneel in prayer in a corner of one of the hallways.”

“CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper said Friday that if the Lewiston School Department did not address its four requests to allow prayer, modify school policy, institute training and protect Aden from retaliation, “we wouldn’t really have much choice but to take the case further” because “the student has the legal right and the constitutional right to pray in school in a manner that is not disruptive to the learning environment.”

Maine could learn a thing or two from Tennessee. Paging the ACLU…

“ASHLAND CITY, Tenn. (ABP) — Tennessee’s chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit Nov. 16 accusing the Cheatham County Board of Education of ignoring more than four decades of court decisions interpreting the separation of church and state.”

“The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, claims board members and the principals of two schools for years have endorsed and promoted religion through extracurricular activities like marching band, choir and sports; classroom instruction and related content; and graduation ceremonies and other school events.”

I sure hope the ACLU goes after CAIR for trying to provide “constitutionally protected religious accommodation” like prayer rooms in public schools. They wouldn’t want to be seen as hypocrites, would they?

The people of Maine should weigh in here, too. Will they be OK with their tax dollars being used to create “prayer rooms” for Muslims in their publicly funded schools?

Most likely, liberals will have no problem with any of this. Unless of course, Muslims in Maine suddenly want to put up Christmas Trees in the schools.

After all, that would be an outrage.

I hope the Democrats want to have a frank discussion about the Ku Klux Klan. It’s about time the people of America knew the truth. The truth is that the Democrats OWN the KKK. They invented it, they embraced it and they LIE about it all the time.

Yesterday, Rep. Henry Johnson of Georgia (A Democrat) invoked racist images of KKK members galloping across the American countryside with nooses in hand if SC Rep. Joe (Truth Czar) Wilson (Republican)  wasn’t disciplined on the House floor.

Here’s the video:

What a fucking farce.

The fact of the matter is that the KKK was/is an invention of DEMOCRATS. Period.

A blog called The Real Democrat Party points out the following:

• Democrats fought to expand slavery while Republicans fought to end it.
• Democrats passed those discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws.
• Democrats supported and passed the Missouri Compromise to protect slavery.
• Democrats supported and passed the Kansas Nebraska Act to expand slavery.
• Democrats supported and backed the Dred Scott Decision.
• Democrats opposed educating blacks and murdered teachers.
• Democrats fought against anti-lynching laws.

Furthermore, the National Black Republican Association, an organization many Americans have probably never even heard of thanks to the media, has written extensively about the Democrats and their ties to the origins of the KKK:

“History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party.  This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian who is the DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University.”

“Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by Democrats against Republicans, black and white.”

So…

Let us have a national conversation about the disgusting aspect of racism in the United States.

Let us have a national conversation about the Ku Klux Klan and its despicable roots.

But let the conversation begin with the Democrat Party, the mother of this American abomination.

Contrary to what you have heard, conservatives embrace freedom for ALL people regardless of their skin color or national origin.

The Democrats gave birth to the KKK. They want to invoke it? Fine. Let’s discuss.

It’s about time they owned it.

Dan Savage is the editor of the alternative Seattle newspaper “The Stranger.” He is gay and he has been rightly critical of Obama’s lack of support for gay marriage.

However, in the following clip, as a guest on the Keith Olbermann show, he goes over the top. He claims that Republicans want Obama to get killed. This is outrageous on so many levels. Leave out the fact that Glenn Beck is a Libertarian, NOT a Republican. At least get your facts “straight” Dan. Furthermore, Conservatives Rush Limbaugh and Michelle Bachman have never called for violence against President Obama.

Conservatives respect and revere the office of the President, even if they disagree with the policies of the man who holds the office. There has NEVER been a case of a President of the United States killed by a Conservative.

In fact, EVERY single assault on the President of the United States has been perpetrated by a radical LEFTIST from John Wilkes Booth to Lee Harvey Oswald.

Maybe Dan Savage should spend a few minutes reading American history rather than trying to re-write it.

EXIT QUESTION: Who is it on the right who is trying to enforce religious views on anyone? Note to Dan Savage: The “Moral Majority” ended in the 1980′s.

The only person I know who is appealing to religious communities is OBAMA! It is Obama who is reaching out to religious leaders in an attempt to push his own agenda.

If Dan Savage has such a problem with politicians using religion to push personal politics, he might want to start with the President for whom he’s so desperately concerned.

Live free or die?

A retired cop stood up at a New Hampshire town hall meeting for Carol Shea Porter (D) of New Hampshire this weekend and asked why out of state SEIU members were present at the meeting. Result? At Shea Porter’s request, he was removed from the meeting by the police.

VIDEO:

Now Hampshire has a full report which includes some interesting background on Carol Shea Porter and her changed attitude about protesters at town hall meetings.

“In four short years Carol Shea-Porter has evolved from a rabble-rousing, town hall disrupting anti-war activist who once had to be forcibly removed from a President George Bush event in Portsmouth to a Member of Congress who instructed armed security guards to remove a frustrated voter from her own town hall event in Manchester on Saturday.”

“Four years ago Carol Shea-Porter protested at the State House alongside people dressed as Nazis while accusing the federal government of trying to “brand us like sheep.” On Saturday, she disparagingly referred to people who do not trust the same federal government to run our health care system as “these people.”

“We remember when, Carol, do you?”

Chief Obama propagandist David Axelrod, the man who wrote the vacuous slogan “yes we can,” has a vested interest in the passage of ObamaCare. It’s making him rich.

Axelrod’s former firm, for which his son still works, is AKPD Media and they are being paid by an organization called Health Economy Now to help push ObamaCare. Health Economy Now includes big PHARMA, the SEIU and the AARP. The conflict of interest? AKPD owes David Axelrod a lot of money.

See how many hands wash the others?

David Axelrod helps to pass ObamaCare. ObamaCare passes, AKPD has more money. AKPD gives money to David Axelrod. Everyone is happy!

Hugh Hewitt of Town Hall busted this wide open yesterday.

“If Axelrod has been negotiating any part of any deal involving any of these players which are funneling money to the firm that owes him money, or if he is advising the president on the deals with any of these groups, that’s a conflict of interest.  Laundering the money through a “coalition” doesn’t remove the conflict much less the appearance of impropriety.  The coalition is in effect partially funding David Axelrod’s severance package though its members might have done so unknowingly.  These forthcoming payments to Axelrod are much more significant than the sort of “retained ties”  that Democrats blasted Dick Cheney for vis-a-vis Halliburton even though there was no high level negotiations between the vice president and his former company.”

Like Hewitt, Michelle Malkin, author of Culture of Corruption, cites an important Bloomberg article on this subject and makes the following point:

“Now, Bloomberg’s Timothy Burger brings news about Axelrod’s latest health care conflicts of interest that will come as no surprise to those who have fully informed themselves of the Chicago way. While White House press secretary Robert Gibbs assails the motives of grass-roots activists by falsely smearing the movement as corporate-funded shills, Barack Obama’s own senior adviser and chief Astroturfer raked in millions of dollars from Big Pharma.”

This story is beginning to take root in the mainstream press and is currently on the front page of the Politico:

“Critics of President Obama’s health-care overhaul are zeroing in on his senior adviser, whose former partners at a Chicago-based firm are the beneficiaries of huge ad buys—now at $24 million and counting—by White House allies in the reform fight.”

Not too long ago, our friends on the left cared about supposed conflicts of interest. In fact, they couldn’t shut up about it. Now? Not so much. Ed Morrissey at Hot Air is waiting for the outrage from the left but isn’t holding his breath.

Of course, it has never been proven that Dick Cheney had any conflict of interest where Halliburton was concerned but that never stopped the left. If you want a good laugh, watch the great Halliburton protest of 2007 below.