NOTE: This method of screwing Ohio taxpayers only works if you’re a Democrat whose salary is paid by the people.

Step 1. Use your position, while on taxpayer funded time, to dig for dirt on a private citizen. The private citizen should be an innocent person who simply asks any question that makes your preferred candidate look bad.

Step 2. After using your resources to search private information on said citizen, get the info out to the nutroots in an effort to discredit and smear the innocent citizen. You can also do this on taxpayer funded state time.

Step 3. When said private citizen sues you, use your resources within the Democrat sleaze machine to have your legal defense fees paid for by the taxpayers. – You know… the very people you screwed in the first place.

Repeat as necessary.

David Neiwert of Crooks and Liars is suddenly concerned about domestic terrorists who are anti-government and make bombs.

Neiwert has had his panties in a twist since last fall when Sarah Palin brought up Obama’s association to Bill Ayers and he’s still angry about it.

He has tried to point out that there are right wing domestic terrorists, which is true. Eric Rudolph and Timothy McVeigh are the examples Neiwert has used most frequently.

Unfortunately for Neiwert’s argument, Sarah Palin wasn’t friends with them. Nor did she launch her career in one of their living rooms.

Nice try, Dave.

More at Memeorandum.

American leftists are quick to cry foul when they see any combination of religion and politics on the conservative side, but it’s a different story if religion can be used to promote their agenda.

Case in point? Liberals recently held faith based “prayer vigils” in favor of ObamaCare at Senator Joe Lieberman’s house in Connecticut…

Talking Points Memo:

“A growing number Connecticut’s religious leaders are calling on Sen. Joe Lieberman to appeal to a higher power and change his mind about including a public option in a health care reform bill. Last night, hundreds of reform supporters from congregations across the state held a candlelight vigil outside Lieberman’s home in Stamford, CT.”

SEIU:

On Sunday, members of the Connecticut faith community staged a candlelight vigil outside Sen. Joe Lieberman’s home in Connecticut. The Stamford Advocate reported, “clergy from several religious dominations prayed in three languages outside the fourth-term senator’s home, surrounded by a crowd the Fire Marshal’s Office estimated to number nearly 500.”

My Left Nutmeg:

“This has to send a potent message to Lieberman. The symbolism is simply stunning. Rabbis protesting outside Joe Lieberman’s home in Stamford? Dan Malloy? Who thought they’d ever see this happening?”

Connecticut Bob:

“Over 500 clergy, parishioners, and residents attended a prayer vigil outside the Stamford home of Sen. Joe Lieberman last night to protest the senator’s promise to block a vote on health care reform.”

Huffington Post:

“More than 400 Connecticut residents, health care reform advocates, and clergy attended an evening prayer vigil that began at Senator Joe Lieberman’s Alma Mater, Stamford High School.”

This is a typical double standard which everyone remembers from the 2008 presidential election.

Sarah Palin’s religious beliefs were continually twisted into lies:

“Three months before she was thrust into the national political spotlight, Gov. Sarah Palin was asked to handle a much smaller task: addressing the graduating class of commission students at her one-time church, Wasilla Assembly of God. Speaking before the Pentecostal church, Palin painted the current war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act out the will of the Lord.”

Yet Obama’s documented radical religious connections were no problem at all:

“Of all the strange features of this presidential race, the tarnishing of Barack Obama has got to be the most ridiculous. First Obama was accused of anti-religious elitism. Then he was accused of identifying with the underclass anger of his spiritual mentor. Excuse me, but which is it? Start with Obama’s turbulent preacher. Yes, Jeremiah Wright says some disgraceful things. But can anyone explain how that changes Obama’s qualities as a candidate?”

You guys on the left have no business holding “prayer vigils” for ObamaCare or anything else for that matter.

Don’t think this will be forgotten when you’re thrown out of power.

Tick tick tick tick tick tick………

“Carpet Muncher” is a politically correct term, right? After all, if “Teabagger” is OK, then why not Pole Smoker, or “homo?”

I digress…

Noted lefty Carpet Muncher, Rachel Maddow, has finally apologized for falsely accusing Rush Limbaugh of racism with unchecked statements which were made up out of thin air…

“On June 3, Rachel Maddow said during her TV show that Rush Limbaugh is the “guy who says the assassin of Martin Luther King, Jr. should get the Medal of Honor.”

“MADDOW: And finally, a quote falsely attributed to talk show host Rush Limbaugh recently resurfaced during the debate over whether or not he would or should be part of a group bidding to buy the St. Louis Rams football team.”

“To set the record straight, Rush Limbaugh apparently never said that Martin Luther King Jr.`s assassin should receive the Medal of Honor. And I was in error when we reported that we had. Mea culpa.”

No problem, boyish dyke.

We “Teabaggers” on the right accept your apology despite your lipstick appearance, diesel mouth and tuna stained breath. We strive to be as open minded as you are.

And by the way, thanks for opening up the world of homo slurs by flagrantly throwing around the term “Teabagger” as an acceptable insult.

After all, we couldn’t have done it without you.

Hang onto your hats, Sarah Palin fans. People Magazine is reporting that Governor Palin is “FINALLY” sitting down with Oprah Winfrey after “turning down” an opportunity to be on Oprah last fall. Why? Because she just wants to sell her book…

Their headline?

Sarah Palin “FINALLY” to Appear on Oprah

“Oh, what a difference a multimillion-dollar book deal makes.”

“About a year after Sarah Palin famously turned down a campaign season appearance with talk show host – and major Barack Obama supporter – Oprah Winfrey, the former GOP vice presidential candidate has agreed to take her turn on the couch.”

That’s funny.

The way I remember it,  Oprah REFUSED to have Sarah Palin on her show…

“Are you kidding me? The strongest and most popular voice for women in this country is refusing to interview the first woman nominated to be vice president in 24 years?”

Here’s a screen capture you can click to open, just in case the editors of People Magazine decide to scrub their site when they suddenly get over their collective amnesia…

Dear Editors of People Magazine: We’ll be watching closely for your reaction when President Obama “FINALLY” has the stones to sit down with Chris Wallace of FOX News.

Until then, you might want to start reading Drudge.

I’m just sayin’…

Why not? They’re already comfortable using the word “Teabagger.”

Will liberals be offended if the media starts using words like faggot, fudge packer and pole smoker?

If “teabagging” is acceptable then why not?

How about carpet muncher?

Why does decency from the press only apply to liberals? Why is the liberal media allowed to use homophobic slurs as a political weapon?

Make no mistake. EVERYONE in this video knows it’s called the Tea Party movement. The use of the terms “tea baggers” and “tea bagging” is a deliberate choice of words.

It’s anti-gay speech used by liberals who claim to support gay people.

Behold further proof that the anti-war movement has very little to do with war. Code Pink is the same group that disrupted numerous hearings on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at one point even assualting Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice with fake blood on their palms.

This is the same Code Pink that shamefully disrupted a hearing in the House from General Petraeus in 2007.

Now they’ve conveniently discovered that America’s presence in Afghanistan is very important. I’m sure this has nothing to do with our new president, who just happens to be a Democrat.

What a difference a D makes.

“Code Pink, founded in 2002 to oppose the US invasion of Iraq, is one of the more high-profile women’s antiwar groups being forced to rethink its position as Afghan women explain theirs: Without international troops, they say, armed groups could return with a vengeance – and that would leave women most vulnerable.”

“We would leave with the same parameters of an exit strategy but we might perhaps be more flexible about a timeline,” says Benjamin. “That’s where we have opened ourselves, being here, to some other possibilities. We have been feeling a sense of fear of the people of the return of the Taliban. So many people are saying that, ‘If the US troops left the country, would collapse. We’d go into civil war.’ A palpable sense of fear that is making us start to reconsider that.”

“Code Pink says it will continue to oppose sending more troops to Afghanistan – a move facing heated debate in Washington – and advocate for more funding for aid and humanitarian projects instead.”

Byron York of the Washington Examiner saw this coming months ago and he was right…

“Remember the anti-war movement? Not too long ago, the Democratic party’s most loyal voters passionately opposed the war in Iraq. Democratic presidential candidates argued over who would withdraw American troops the quickest. Netroots activists regularly denounced President George W. Bush, and sometimes the U.S. military (“General Betray Us”). Cindy Sheehan, the woman whose soldier son was killed in Iraq, became a heroine when she led protests at Bush’s Texas ranch.”

“That was then. Now, even though the United States still has roughly 130,000 troops in Iraq, and is quickly escalating the war in Afghanistan — 68,000 troops there by the end of this year, and possibly more in 2010 — anti-war voices on the Left have fallen silent.”

It seems the left was staying silent just long enough to see what Obama was going to do. Now they’re re-shifting their positions to match his. It’s pathetic.

Before every single lefty blogger on Earth calls me a racist for simply asking this question, I’d like to point to the headline story on Politico.com which caused me to ask the question in the first place:

For CBC, the joy is tempered by worry

“For the Congressional Black Caucus and its 42 members, these should be the best of times.”

“The caucus boasts unprecedented power on Capitol Hill, with four of its members chairing major House committees and 18 others wielding subcommittee gavels. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) serves as majority whip, and African-American lawmakers find themselves a key bloc of votes on everything from health care reform to climate change to ethics rule revisions. Mega-corporations like Anheuser-Busch, Coca-Cola and Toyota will shell out hundreds of thousands of dollars this week to sponsor the annual legislative conference hosted by the CBC Foundation, the group’s nonprofit arm.”

42 members of the CBC and every single one of them is a Democrat? Not a single Republican?

It almost seems like the Congressional Black Caucus is not a Black organization but really a Democrat organization because otherwise they would have reached out to candidates sponsored by the National Black Republican Association at some point. I mean, the Congressional Black Caucus should represent Black People of all political persuasions.

Right?

And furthermore, White Democrats would never demonize Black Republicans and re-write history just for the sake of political gain.

Right?

Talking Points Memo, a lefty Obama worshiping blog is suddenly concerned about the political race card. Why? Because the black man they perceive to be playing said card is Republican Chairman Michael Steele.

You see, it’s only racism when Conservatives/Republicans/Libertarians point out the hypocrisy of the left.

While I’m on this thread, let me point out that a genius from the Huffington Post named Matt Osborne penned a piece today which downplays Obama’s propaganda partnership with the NEA.

“Nevertheless, Courrielche argues that since art groups accept grants from the NEA, the NEA is “tainting the creative process by encouraging the art community to address highly controversial political issues.” Which is odd, since there’s nothing controversial about the 9/11 Day of Service — unless, of course, you happen to be a member of the Ayn Rand cult, or you think the day would best be used to inspire hatred and fear of brown people.”

Hatred and fear of “brown people?”

You scumbag. You hateful, fear politicking, scumbag.

You sir, are the racist. You sir, are the one who is trying to inspire fear and hatred based solely on race and purely for the furtherance of a political agenda. It is disgusting and you should be ashamed.

Mr. Osborne mentions in his bio: Matt Osborne has been blogging forever but has yet to see his first check from George Soros. Let me explain that for you Matt… You see the capitalist who owns the Huffington Post is keeping all of the capital for herself.

And by the way, I assume by the “Ayn Rand Cult” remark, that you were referring to Libertarians since you linked the term to Reason Magazine. I find it ironic when Obama supporters talk about “cults.”

They say a picture is worth a thousand Obots words.

Apparently, Conservatives have no right to be outraged over Obama’s attempt to propagandize the National Endowment for the Arts because George W. Bush created the Faith Based Initiatives Program.

Pay no mind to the fact that Obama has expanded Bush’s Faith Based Initiatives Program.

Move along folks, nothing to see here.

More at Memeorandum.